State v. Glover

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT

BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Freddie Lee Glover,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

Marc H. Westbrook, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-080

Submitted February 1, 2005 – Filed February
4, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Robert M. Pachak, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; 
and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Freddie Lee Glover was convicted
of burglary in the first degree, armed robbery, and kidnapping.  He was sentenced
to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.  Glover’s appellate
counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967).  Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from representation,
asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable merit.  Glover
filed a pro se response with this court.

After a review of the record as required by Anders
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there
are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly,
we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., KITTREDGE and WILLIAMS,
JJ., concur.

         
1  We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules
215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.