State v. Luckett

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Nathan Luckett, Appellant.

Appeal From Orangeburg County

 Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2005-UP-026

Submitted January 1, 2005 – Filed January
13, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney
General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Walter M. Bailey, Jr., of Summerville,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Nathan Luckett was indicted for armed robbery, carjacking,
and kidnapping.  The jury found him guilty of all charges.  The trial court
sentenced him to concurrent sentences of life in prison without the possibility
of parole on all of the charges, pursuant to South Carolina Code Annotated section
17-25-45 (2003 & Supp. 2003), as Luckett had two prior convictions for armed
robbery.  Luckett’s counsel attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved
as counsel stating she had reviewed the record and concluded the appeal lacked
merit.  Luckett did not file a pro se response.  After a thorough review
of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and
State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.