CourtListener 10137979•State v. McCrea
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED
ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Torrance McCrea, Appellant.
Appeal From Williamsburg County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-604
Submitted December 1, 2004 Filed December 3, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Torrance McCrea was convicted of murder, assault and battery
with intent to kill (ABIK), possession of a weapon during the commission of
a violent crime, and discharging a firearm at or into a dwelling or occupied
structure. He was sentenced to thirty years for murder, twenty years for ABIK,
five years for possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime,
and ten years for discharging a firearm, to be served concurrently. McCreas
appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from
representation, asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable
merit. McCrea filed a pro se response with the Court.
After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels
petition to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.
[1] We
decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.