Roberson v. State

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Tyrone Roberson, Petitioner

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent

Appeal From Jasper County

 Jackson V. Gregory, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.
2004-UP-627 

Submitted December 1, 2004 – Filed December
10, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Assistant Attorney General
Adrianne L. Turner, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Tyrone L. Roberson appeals the circuit court’s dismissal
of his habeas corpus petition.  Roberson’s appellate counsel has petitioned
to be relieved as counsel, stating he has reviewed the record and has concluded
Roberson’s appeal is without merit.  Roberson filed a separate pro
se brief.

After consideration of Roberson’s pro se brief and review of
the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there
are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly,
we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.   

1We decide this
case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.