State v. Tisdale

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Jeremy Richard Tisdale,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Berkeley County

R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-567

Submitted November 1, 2004 – Filed November 15, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Deputy Chief Attorney Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Jeremy Richard Tisdale,
was indicted for murder.  The trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment
without the possibility of parole.  Tisdale’s counsel attached to the final
brief a petition to be relieved as counsel stating she had reviewed the record
and concluded the appeal lacked merit.  We dismiss pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991).  Counsel’s petition to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, BEATTY, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.