State v. Dickerson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. 
IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED BY RULE 239)d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Joseph Lee Dickerson,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-387

Submitted April 21, 2004 – Filed June
18, 2004

APPEAL DISMISED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, Office
of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia;  and Socicitor
Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Joseph Dickerson appeals his
conviction on a charge of trafficking in cocaine more than ten grams but less
than twenty-eight grams. Counsel for Dickerson attached to the final brief a
petition to be relieved as counsel. Dickerson did not file a separate pro
se response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Dickerson’s
appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.