State v. Gregory

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Tammy Gregory,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-420

Submitted April 21, 2004 – Filed June
25, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary,
S.C. Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox,
Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Tammy Gregory appeals the revocation
of her probation on a charge of filing false claims. Counsel for Gregory attached
to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Gregory did not file
a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Gregory’s
appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.