State v. Caldwell

THIS OPINION HAS
NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Domernic L. Caldwell,
Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion
No. 2004-UP-292

Submitted February 23, 2004
– Filed May 5, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; and Solicitor
Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Appellant pled guilty to second-degree burglary, criminal conspiracy,
two counts of armed robbery, and possession of a firearm, and he was sentenced. 
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Appellant’s counsel
attached a petition to be relieved.   Appellant did not file a pro se
response. 

After
a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits. 
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. [1]    

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concur.   

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.