State v. Williams

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Travis Sentell Williams,       
Appellant.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-314

Submitted March 19, 2004 – Filed May 13, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant

Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation, of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  On February 28, 2000, Travis
Williams was sentenced to seven years with five years probation for his conviction
on a criminal sexual conduct charge. His probation was revoked in June 2003
after Williams admitted to hitting his girlfriend and failed to meet with his
parole agent. Williams appeals. Counsel for Williams attached to the final brief
a petition to be relieved as counsel. Williams did not file a separate pro
se response.

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly
appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss
Williams’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.