In the Interest of Rodriquez P.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In The Interest Of: Rodriquez P.,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Bamberg County

Dale Moore Gable, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-326

Submitted March 19, 2004 – Filed May
14, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Rodriquez pled guilty
to second-degree burglary and disturbing a school.  The family court committed
him to the Department of Juvenile Justice for an indeterminate period not to
exceed his twenty-first birthday.  Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriquez’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved. 
Rodriquez did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Rodriquez’s appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving
any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.