CourtListener 10137600•State v. Eubanks
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.
IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Larry Allen Eubanks,
Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-250
Submitted February 20, 2004 Filed
April 15, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda P. Hagler, South
Carolina Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Larry Allen Eubanks (Appellant)
was convicted of first-degree burglary and petit larceny. He was sentenced
to eighteen years in prison for first-degree burglary and thirty days for petit
larceny.
On appeal, counsel for Appellant has filed a final
brief along with a petition to be relieved as counsel. Appellant has not filed
a pro se response. After a thorough review of the record pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels
petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]
GOOSLBY and HOWARD, JJ., and CURETON, Acting J., concur.
[1] This case is decided without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.