State v. Wright

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT

BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT
IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Robert D. Wright,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Clarendon County

Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-255

Submitted February 23, 2004 – Filed April 15, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia,
for Appellant,

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil Kelley Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant pled guilty to assault
and battery of a high and aggravated nature and distribution of crack cocaine. 
He was sentenced to                                                           
eight years imprisonment.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), appellant’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Appellant
did not file a pro se response. 

After review of the record pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.