State v. Hunter

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT
IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Demetrius Darnell Hunter,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-169

Submitted January 29, 2004 – Filed March 15, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, Office of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant,

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia;  and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  In June 2002, Appellant pled
guilty to voluntary manslaughter.  Following a standard guilty plea voir
dire, the court accepted Hunter’s guilty plea, and he was sentenced.  On
appeal, Appellant argues that the circuit court erred in accepting his plea
because he did not make it voluntarily and intelligently.  Appellant’s appellate
counsel has petitioned to be relieved as counsel, stating that she has reviewed
the record and has concluded Appellant’s appeal is without merit.  Appellant
has not filed a pro se brief. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues
that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and
grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. [1]    

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur. 
     

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.