State v. Robinson

CourtListener 10137532ScctappMar 16, 2004

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Otis M. Robinson,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

John M. Milling, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-175

Submitted January 29, 2004 – Filed March
16, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia;
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
of Columbia; Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Otis M. Robinson
was convicted of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (“ABHAN”)
and assaulting a police officer while resisting arrest.  Robinson was sentenced
to six years imprisonment for ABHAN and three years imprisonment for assaulting
a police officer while resisting arrest, with the sentences to run concurrently. 
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Robinson’s counsel
attached a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Robinson did not file a pro
se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Robinson’s appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.