State v. Redd

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Chad Redd,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-752

Submitted October 15, 2003 – Filed December 18, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans,
Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Chad Redd appeals from the
revocation of his probation. Counsel for Redd attached to the final brief a
petition to be relieved as counsel.  Redd did not file a separate pro se
brief. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Redd’s appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

STILWELL, BEATTY, and CURETON, JJ.,
concur.