State v. Perry

CourtListener 10137245ScctappNov 17, 2003

Full text

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Darrell Gene Perry,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Gary E. Clary, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-665

Submitted September 17, 2003 – Filed November 17, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal
Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent(s).

PER CURIAM:  Darrell Perry appeals from
the revocation of his sentence. Counsel for Perry attached to the final brief
a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Perry did not file a separate pro se
response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Perry’s appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.