State v. Wilson

CourtListener 10137062ScctappJun 19, 2003

Full text

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Karla Wilson,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

B. Hicks Harwell, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion
No.  2003-UP-413

Submitted April 18, 2003 – Filed
June 19, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal
Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Karla Wilson appeals from an order of the trial court revoking
her probation.  She initially pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. 
She was sentenced to two years, suspended upon the service of five years probation. 
Wilson violated her probation.  The judge revoked her probation in full and
reinstated the two year sentence.  Wilson’s appellate counsel filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).  Counsel additionally
submitted a petition to be relieved from representation, asserting there are
no directly appealable issues of arguable merit.  Wilson did not file a pro
se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON, and HUFF, JJ., concur.

[1]
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.