State v. Cheatham

CourtListener 10136916ScctappMar 4, 2003

Full text

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Etta Cheatham,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-177

Submitted January 10, 2003 – Filed March
4, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia;
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Etta Cheatham pled guilty to
temporary use of a vehicle without permission and financial transaction card
theft.  She received concurrent sentences of one year imprisonment for the vehicle
charge and three years imprisonment for the theft charge.  Cheatham appeals,
arguing the plea judge erred in accepting her guilty plea without adequately
advising her about sentencing consequences.  Appellate counsel has filed a final
brief and a petition to be relieved.  Cheatham did not file a pro se
response.

After a thorough review of the record on appeal
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we grant counsel’s petition
and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY, and SHULER, JJ., concur.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.