State v. Salley

CourtListener 10136876ScctappMar 22, 2003

Full text

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Willie Salley,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-370

Submitted March 26, 2003 – Filed May
22, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia;
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
of Columbia; Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant Willie Salley was
convicted of breach of trust, less than $5,000.  The trial court sentenced him
to five years suspended to five years probation with restitution.  The court
further ordered that Salley’s probation could terminate after eighteen months
if he had paid the restitution in full and was otherwise in compliance with
the terms of his probation.  Counsel for Salley attached to the final brief
a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Salley did not file a pro se response.

After a review of the record as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116,406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that
are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Salley’s appeal and grant
counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON and HUFF, JJ. concur.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.