CourtListener 10136820•State v. Davenport
Full text
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Avery Davenport,
Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
Costa M. Pleicones, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-001
Submitted October 22, 2002 Filed January
6, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Tara Shurling, of Columbia; for Appellant.
Attorney General Charles M. Condon; Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General B. Allen Bullard;
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; Warren
Blair Giese, of Columbia; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Avery Davenport appeals his
convictions and sentences for first degree criminal sexual conduct and petit
larceny. Counsel for Davenport attached to the final brief a petition to be
relieved as counsel. Davenport did not file a separate pro se response.
After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Davenports
appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
CONNOR, STILWELL, and HOWARD, JJ., concur.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.