State v. Suber

CourtListener 10136790ScctappJan 16, 2003

Full text

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

James Suber,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-048

Submitted November 20, 2002 – Filed
January 16, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia;
for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox; Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Jr.; Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin,all of Columbia; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  James Suber appeals his guilty
plea to possession of crack cocaine and the revocation of two years of his suspended
sentence for a prior offense.  Counsel for Suber attached to the final brief
a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Suber did not file a separate pro se
response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Suber’s appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CONNOR, STILWELL, and HOWARD, JJ.,
concur.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.