CourtListener 10125868•State v. Latoya D. Rivers
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Latoya Denise Rivers, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2023-001235
Appeal From Richland County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-304
Submitted August 28, 2024 – Filed September 4, 2024
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and
Latoya Denise Rivers, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds
Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and VINSON, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.