Petitions for review, October 24, 2019

365 Or 657 ; 365 Or 658Or

Full text

657
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
(451 P3d 610-612, 1012-1017)
ALLOWED
October 24, 2019
Eaken v. SAIF Corporation (A165038)(S065925)(291 Or App 447). Eaken’s petition
for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this
case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Caren
v. Providence Health System Oregon, 365 Or 466, 446 P3d 67 (2019).
Johnson v. SAIF Corporation (A160491)(S065986)(291 Or App 1). Johnson’s
petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated,
and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light
of Caren v. Providence Health System Oregon, 365 Or 466, 446 P3d 67 (2019).
McDermott v. SAIF Corporation (A160016)(S065299)(286 Or App 406).
McDermott’s petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of
Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for
reconsideration in light of Caren v. Providence Health System Oregon, 365 Or
466, 446 P3d 67 (2019).
Perez, Ernie Junior v. Cain (A164434)(S067002)(297 Or App 617)
Randall v. SAIF Corporation (A160626)(S066220)(291 Or App 331). The petition
for review filed by SAIF Corporation and Jadent Incorporated is allowed. The
decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the
Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Gadalean v. SAIF, 364 Or 707,
439 P3d 965 (2019).
Stryker v. SAIF Corporation (A159793)(S065380)(287 Or App 769). Stryker’s
petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated,
and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light
of Caren v Providence Health System Oregon, 365 Or 466, 446 P3d 67 (2019).
DENIED
October 24, 2019
Baker, Donald v. Cain (A166126)(S066973)(297 Or App 811)
Contreras, Roberto v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A162979)
(S066925)(297 Or App 469)
Dentel, James Wyatt v. Cain (A166567)(S066962)(298 Or App 554)
Department of Human Services v. T. E. B. (A169845)(S066926)(298 Or App 493)
Haynes, Michael v. Cain (A165190)(S066946)(298 Or App 142)
Hudson, Frank Gronroos v. Cain (A165180)(S066913)(297 Or App 810)
Keller v. Healy (A166155)(S066774)(296 Or App 525)
Myers, Alisha Dawn v. Howton (A160648)(S066762)(296 Or App 500)
Patton v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company (A162134)(S066836)(296 Or
App 266)
Salmon, Richard v. Cain (A168429)(S066948)(298 Or App 493)
State v. Bolden, Xavier Dorrell (A165626)(A165035)(S066944)(298 Or App 493)
State v. Clark, Rebekah Christine (A166597)(S066936)(298 Or App 554). Balmer,
J., would allow.
State v. Edwards, Christopher Allen (A166489)(S066971)(298 Or App 494)
State v. Fallert, Hannah Mae (A165937)(S066972)(297 Or App 811)
State v. Garner, Charles William (A165581/82)(S066909)(297 Or App 881). Flynn,
J., would allow.
658 	PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued
(451 P3d 1013-1017)
State v. Harvey, Mickey Lapham (A166827)(S066891)(298 Or App 375)
State v. Jones, Steven Michael (A163957)(S066900)(298 Or App 264)
State v. Kent, Lawaun Terrell James (A165179)(S066947)(297 Or App 888)
State v. Pilcher, Collin Jason (A166446)(S066981)(298 Or App 375)
State v. Schwarz, Wolfgang (A166898)(S066928)(297 Or App 811)
State v. Shamet, Barbara Jean (A166895)(S066929)(297 Or App 811)
State v. Williams, Albert Newell (A161673)(S066898)(297 Or App 384)
Treadwell, Justin v. Cain (A166878)(S067035)(298 Or App 494)
U. S. Bank National Association v. Dunn (A167615)(S066915)(297 Or App 582)
Younger, Elizabeth McGee v. Office of Adult Abuse Prevention and Investigations
(A168362)(S066953)(297 Or App 888)
DISMISSED
October 24, 2019
State v. Koch, Reed Scott (A161728)(S065694)(289 Or App 642, rev allowed, 363
Or 677 (2018). The petition for review is dismissed as improvidently allowed.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.