Miscellaneous Supreme Court dispositions, December 9, 2009

347 Or 367Or

Full text

367
MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT
DISPOSITIONS
(222 P3d 1092)
BALLOT TITLES CERTIFIED
December 9, 2009
Berman v. Kroger (S057802). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's
certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 54 (2010) does not comply sub-
stantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to
the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the pro-
posed ballot measure.
Berman v. Kroger (S057883). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's
certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 57 (2010) does not comply sub-
stantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to
the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the pro-
posed ballot measure.
Caruthers v. Kroger (S057687); Day et al v. Kroger (S057693). Petitioner's argu-
ment that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition
No. 47 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not
well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's
certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057763). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney Gen-
eral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 49 (2010) does not comply
substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies
to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the
proposed ballot measure.
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057773). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney Gen-
eral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 50 (2010) does not comply
substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies
to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the
proposed ballot measure.
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057804); Syrett et al v. Kroger (S057814). Petitioner's
argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Peti-
tion No. 51 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is
not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney Gen-
eral's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.
Day et al v. Kroger (S057884). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's
certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 58 2010) does not comply sub-
stantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to
the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the pro-
posed ballot measure.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.