336 Or 422•Petitions for review, February 18, 2004
Full text
422 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (86 P3d 1138, 1139) ALLOWED February 18, 2004 American Bankers Insurance Company v. State of Oregon (Al15183)(S50816)(188 OrApp606) State v. Connally, Richard Michael (Al 16517)(S50999)( 189 Or App 551) State v. Wolleat, Richard James (All6196)(S50919)(189 Or App 336) DENIED February 18, 2004 Baird, Gerald Ray v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A116936) (S50897J( 189 Or App 334) Clark, David S. v. Schiedler (Al 17888)(S51056)(191 Or App 305) Foerster, Danny Earl v. Lampert (All 7833)(S51061)(191 Or App 148) Francis v. Employment Department (A 119989)(S51048)(190 Or App 304) Friends of Jacksonville v. City of Jacksonville (A121344)(S50932)(189 Or App 283) Howard, Clayton L. v. Czerniak (Al 20427)(S51094)(191 Or App 306) Munday, Paul Norman v. Lampert (A115732)(S50735J(1890r App 257) Schwab v. SAIF Corporation (Al18746)(S51027)(1900r App 133) Shafer, Gregory v. Hill (Al 14566)(S51055)(190 Or App 582) State ex rel Department of Human Services v. Schwindt (A121474-76) (S51069)(190 Or App 305) State ex rel Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. Morgan (A120767l (S51075)(191 Or App 148) State ex rel Shelby v. Palmateer (Al 16046)(S50895)(189 Or App 596)(petition and supplemental petition) State v. Barber, Dennis Michael, Jr. (All 7498/99)(S50983)(1890r App 336) State v. Davidson, Thomas Willard (Al 13553)(S50984)(189 Or App 87) State v. Harris, Richard Traharn (All8428)(S51077)(191 Or App 305) State v. Mayner, Christopher Michael (A116502)(S51103)(191 Or App 144) State v. McCain, Jim B. (Al 15646)(S51073)( 190 Or App 532) State v. Miller, Lee Angus (Al 17788)tS51076)(191 Or App 305) State v. Muzzy, Robert Gary CA113096)(S50997)(1900r App 306) State v. Princehouse, Mark Allen (Al 15668)(851080)( 190 Or App 57 4) State v. Santistevan, Isaac (All0580)(S50964)(189 Or App 87) State v. Schultz, Patrick D. (A116866)(S51050)(191 Or App 147) Stevenson, Michael R. v. Lampert (Al18068)(S51095)(191 Or App 306) Thomason, Al v. Morrow (Al 13080)(850729)( 187 Or App 502) DISMISSED February 18, 2004 State v. Lucio-Camargo, Leopoldo Celos (A104767J(S50418)(186 Or App 144, 62 P3d 811 (2003)). Upon consideration by the court. The motion to dismiss appeal due to defendant's death is granted in part. Petition for review previ- ously allowed October 2, 2003 (336 Or 60) is dismissed as moot. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. '1'he trial court is directed to vacate in its entirety the judgment of conviction of Leopoldo Celos Lucio-Camargo. ORAP 8.05(2).
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.