336 Or 597•Petitions for review, April 6, 2004
Full text
597 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (90P3d625) ALLOWED April 6, 2004 Haynes v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (A120056) (851097)(190 Or App 555) DENIED April 6, 2004 Aki! v. Locnikar (A120412)(851157)(189 Or App 596) Bell v. Public Employees Retirement Board (Al 16728)(851197)(191 Or App 653) Dalev. Department of Consumer and Business Services (All2175)(851090)(1880r App 112) Hahn v. SAIF' Corporation (Al21645J(S51218)(191 Or App 653) Huerta v. Foster (Al 18236)(851176)(1900r App 582) Kowalski v. Hereford L'Oasis (All 7196)(S50955)(1900r App 236) Schoeneberg v. Oregon Department of Transportation, Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Division (DMV) (A118049)(S51207)(191 Or App 653) State v. Bergman, Daniel (A116739)(S51214)(191 Or App 305). Carson, C. J., and De Muniz, J ., would allow. State v. Meeker, Martin Owen (All8199J(S51128)(191 Or App 147) Summer v. Board of Dentistry (All 7391)(S51079)(1880r App 765)
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.