Petitions for review, July 2, 2002

334 Or 327Or

Full text

327
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
(52P3d435)
July2,2002
Upon consideration by the court. In the case listed below, the petition for
review is allowed in part and denied in part. The review regarding liabil-
ity for court-appointed attorney compensation and expenses is allowed.
The petition for review is denied concerning all other issues. The decision
of the Court of Appeals regarding liability for court-appointed attorney
compensation and expenses is reversed. The judgment of the circuit court
is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded to the
circuit court for further proceedings in light of Bacote v. Johnson, 833 Or
28, 85 P3d 1019 (2001).
Rennells, Joshua v. Lampert (Al10945J(S49424)(179 Or App 742)
DENIED
July2,2002
Howard, Paul D. v. Morrow (A109720J(S49476](1800r App 205)
Keeney v. University of Oregon (A104503J(849390)( 178 Or App 198)
Lawrence v. Clackamas County and Clancy (Al16469J(S49487)(180 Or App 495)
McClure v. City of Springfield (A113253)(S48805)(175 Or App 425)
Statev. Becker, Dylan Jon (A110387)(S49355)(1780r App 602)
Statev. Cunningham, Wendell (Al07209)(S49461)(1790r App 498)
State v. Kautz, Dennis Charles (A102986-88)(A103386-89)(A103822)(849456J(l 79
OrApp458)
State v. Nevins, Barrett Lee (Al01920)(S49421)(177 Or App 330)
State v. Smith, Darrell Darwin (Al13102)(849488)(1800r App 393)
Wilson, Marlo v. Morrow (A114266)(S49480)(1800r App 613)

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.