State Tax Commission v. Santa Teresa Land Co.

CourtListener 3592241NmJan 17, 1925

Full text

OPINION OF THE COURT

PARKER, C. J.

No assignments of error have been filed by appellant although the time for filing the same has long since passed. Appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal and affirm judgment. The motion will be sustained, upon the authority of section 22 of chapter 43, Laws 1917, and Acequia Madre et al. v Meyer et al., 17 N. M. 371, 128 P. 68, Gauss-Langerberg Hat Co. v. Bank, 17 N. M. 233, 134 P. 794, Hubbell v. Armijo, 18 N. M. 68, 133 P. 978, In re Murray, 19 N. M. 53, 140 P. 1042, and Neher v. Armijo, 11 N. M. 67, 66 P. 517, and the appeal will he dismissed, and the judgment affirmed, and the cause remanded, with directions to proceed accordingly; and it is so ordered.

BICKLEY and WATSON, JJ., concur.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.