State v. Dunlap

CourtListener 3591957NmDec 14, 1925

Full text

Each of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.