CourtListener 10739834•Herrera v. Rios
Full text
This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in
the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the
citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-
generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Filing Date: November 20, 2025
No. S-1-SC-39711
BENNY DAVID HERRERA,
Petitioner,
v.
HECTOR RIOS, Warden,
Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI
Stephen P. Ochoa, District Judge
Benny David Herrera
Pro se
Chaparral, NM
for Petitioner
Raúl Torrez, Attorney General
Albuquerque, NM
for Respondent
DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF REMAND
VIGIL, Justice.
{1} WHEREAS, this matter came before the Court on petition for writ of certiorari
under Rule 12-501 NMRA seeking review of the Twelfth Judicial District Court’s order
denying Petitioner’s request for release from indeterminate sex-offender parole as the
remedy for failure to hold a timely duration review hearing as required by NMSA 1978,
Section 31-21-10.1(C) (2007);
{2} WHEREAS, the Court initially denied the petition;
{3} WHEREAS, the Court thereafter withdrew the order denying the petition and
ordered that this case be held in abeyance pending the Court’s disposition of Aragon v.
Martinez, S-1-SC-39172;
{4} WHEREAS, this Court has now issued an opinion and mandate in Aragon v.
Martinez, ___-NMSC-___, ___ P.3d ___ (S-1-SC-39172, July 14, 2025) (mandate filed
Aug. 18, 2025);
{5} WHEREAS, the opinion in Aragon addresses and significantly affects the issue of
law presented in this case; and
{6} WHEREAS, the Court exercises its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)(1) NMRA to
dispose of this case by nonprecedential order rather than a formal opinion;
{7} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the abeyance is VACATED and this
matter is REMANDED to the district court to reconsider Petitioner’s right to habeas relief
in accordance with Aragon, ___-NMSC-___, ¶ 42.
{8} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Justice
WE CONCUR:
DAVID K. THOMSON, Chief Justice
C. SHANNON BACON, Justice
JULIE J. VARGAS, Justice
BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Justice
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.