A-1-CA-37000 | Omnilex

Full text

1 	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 	Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. 	No. A-1-CA-37000
5 NATANAEL ESCARCEGA,
6 	Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY
8 Louise E. Depaoli, Jr., District Judge
9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
10 	Santa Fe, NM
11 	for Appellee
12 Natanael Escarcega
13 	Grants, NM
14 Pro Se Appellant
15
16 VANZI, Chief Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
17 	{t} 	Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
18 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has
19 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 1/9/2019 9:29 AM
Mark Reynolds

1 {2} 	IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4 WE CONCUR:
6 M. MONICA ZAMO
7 	~,$, 	~8 JE ~i:ATTREP, Judge
2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

11

12
13

14

15

16

17

18

19

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Court of Appeals of New Mexico

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Filed 1/9/2019 9:29 AM
“cet apen Va
Plaintiff-Appellee, | Mak Regnoke t
v. No. A-1-CA-37000
NATANAEL ESCARCEGA,
Defendant-A ppellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY
Louise E. Depauli, Jr., District Judge
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM
for Appellee
Natanael Escarcega
Grants, NM
Pro Se Appellant
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Chief Judge.
43 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED.

1 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 3 4
findtano
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
5
6 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
7 8
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge
2

January 9, 2019- State of New Mexico v. Natanael Escarcega, No. A-1-CA-37000

Full text

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude