In the Matter of Gisselle Bond, Roselle Board of Education, Monmouth County, 9/4/2024, (321-24SEC)

321-24SEC
SEC Dkt. No. T16-24
Agency Dkt. No. 239-7/24
New Jersey Commissioner of Education
Final Decision
In the Matter of Gisselle Bond,
Roselle Board of Education,
Union County
The record of this matter and the decision of the School Ethics Commission (SEC) have been
reviewed. The SEC found that respondent violated N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33 by failing to timely complete
the required board member training. The SEC’s decision was forwarded to the Commissioner for
final determination on the recommended penalty pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:12-29(c). 	The SEC
recommended a sanction of removal effective upon the adoption of the decision by the
Commissioner. Alternatively, if respondent completed the required training before the issuance of
the Commissioner’s final decision and notified the SEC accordingly, the SEC recommended a
sanction of a thirty-day suspension. 	To date, respondent has not notified the SEC that he has
completed the required training. 	Respondent has not instituted an appeal of the SEC’s underlying
finding of violation pursuant to N.J.A.C. 6A:4-1 et seq. but has filed exceptions to the recommended
penalty.
In her exceptions, respondent indicates that all correspondence regarding this matter was
sent to her personal email address, rather than her Board email address, and, as such, she was
unaware of any issue until the SEC issued its decision on July 23, 2024. Respondent argues that she
completed her Governance III training in October 2023, but the proof of the completed courses was
never uploaded by the New Jersey School Boards Association (NJSBA), which offers the training

2
programs.1 	Respondent also contends that she completed the substantive portions of the
Governance II training online, but mistakenly did not finish the signature section.2 	Respondent
includes copies of what appear to be automated emails from the NJSBA on July 29 and 30, 2024,
which confirm that she completed the trainings, as well as a copy of her transcript showing the
courses as being completed on July 29 and 30, 2024. Respondent urges the Commissioner to reduce
her penalty from a removal or suspension to a reprimand or warning.
Upon review, the Commissioner concurs with the penalty recommended by the SEC for
respondent’s failure to timely honor an obligation placed upon school officials by law. Initially, the
Commissioner finds petitioner’s argument that she did not see any notices about this matter
unavailing. The record reflects that the SEC sent all emails regarding the training requirement, as
well as the OTSC, to the same email address to which it sent the July 23, 2024 decision, which
respondent clearly received. This email address is also the one that respondent used to forward the
NJSBA’s automated emails to her attorney, as demonstrated by Exhibit C to her exceptions, on
August 1, 2024. As the email address used by the SEC was correct and active, there is no reason
that respondent should not have received the SEC’s emails, and the fact that respondent apparently
overlooked them is not sufficient reason to reduce her penalty.
While respondent argues that she completed the training prior to the SEC’s deadline, the
record reflects that the NJSBA did not confirm that the training was completed until July 29 and 30,
2024 – after the SEC issued its decision. 	The Commissioner therefore concludes that respondent
1 Respondent does not provide any documentation regarding her attendance at an October 2023 Governance III
course.
2 Respondent’s certification does not indicate the date on which she allegedly competed the online Governance II
course.

3
completed the training after the SEC issued its decision and, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.3(c), a 30-
day suspension is the appropriate penalty.
Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the Board for 30 days for violating the School
Ethics Act.
IT IS SO ORDERED.3
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
Date of Decision: 	September 4, 2024
Date of Mailing: 	September 5, 2024
3 This decision may be appealed to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:6-
9.1. Under N.J.Ct.R. 2:4-1(b), a notice of appeal must be filed with the Appellate Division within 45 days from the date
of mailing of this decision.

1
Before the School Ethics Commission
Docket No.: T16-24
Decision for Failure to Complete Mandatory Training
Requirement in a Timely Manner
I/M/O Gisselle Bond,
Roselle Board of Education, Union County
I. 	Procedural History
This matter arises from an Order to Show Cause (OTSC) that was issued by the School
Ethics Commission (Commission) in connection with the above-captioned matter at its special
meeting on June 17, 2024, directing Gisselle Bond (Respondent), a “board member” as defined in
N.J.S.A. 18A:12-23 of the School Ethics Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 18A:12-21 et seq., to show cause as to
why the Commission should not find Respondent in violation of the Act, for failing to complete
training as required by N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1.
In the OTSC that was served on June 17, 2024, the Commission notified Respondent that
she had twenty (20) days to respond to the OTSC. Respondent was further advised that failure to
respond would be deemed an admission of the facts set forth in the OTSC, and the Commission
may take action on a summary basis, in accordance with N.J.A.C. 6A:28-1.6(c).
II. 	Analysis
The Act was enacted by the New Jersey State Legislature to ensure and preserve public
confidence in members of local boards of education and local school administrators. N.J.S.A.
18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1 require every board member to complete a training program
prepared and offered by the New Jersey School Boards Association (NJSBA).
Respondent is a member of the Roselle Board of Education, located in Union County. As a
result of her position as a board of education member, and in accordance with N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33
and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1, Respondent is required to complete a mandated training program on an
annual basis. For convenience and ease, the training is offered online so any board member may
complete it at any time, from anywhere. According to NJSBA, Respondent was required to
complete the Governance 2 training program by December 31, 2023.
On or about May 7, 2024, the NJSBA provided the Commission with the names of those
board of education members who failed to complete mandated training by December 31, 2023, and
the list provided included Respondent. Prior to that time, multiple communications about mandated
training were sent to Respondent from the NJSBA through a variety of means, including targeted e-
mail messages on January 4, 2023, as well as postings in School Board Notes on 19 occasions.
Notwithstanding all of these communications, Respondent did not complete mandated training.
As a final warning, the Commission’s staff sent e-mails to Respondent dated May 8, 2024,
May 21, 2024, and June 5, 2024, advising Respondent that the Commission required completion of

2
the training by June 13, 2024, to avoid the issuance of an OTSC for non-compliance. Again,
notwithstanding this correspondence, Respondent did not complete the required training. As a
result, an OTSC was issued by the Commission at its special meeting on June 17, 2024.
To date, there is no dispute that Respondent did not complete her required training by
December 31, 2023, and did not complete the training prior to the Commission’s final deadline of
June 13, 2024, and therefore, the Commission issued an OTSC at its meeting on June 17, 2024.
After having been served with the OTSC, Respondent failed to respond to the Commission’s OTSC
as to why she did not complete training by December 31, 2023, and also failed to complete training
as required by N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1.
III. 	Decision/Penalty Recommendation
N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.2(d) provides that school board members and charter school trustees who
fail to comply with their training mandate shall be considered in violation of N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33.
Based on the record as set forth above, at its meeting on July 23, 2024, the Commission found that
Respondent violated N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33. Respondent received repeated notifications of her training
requirement, and had ample opportunity to complete the mandated training in a timely fashion;
nonetheless, Respondent failed to complete training as required.
Where a violation of the Act is found by the Commission, it may recommend to the
Commissioner of Education that a penalty be imposed. The recommended penalty can include a
reprimand, censure, suspension or removal of the school official. N.J.A.C. 6A:28-9.11. Specifically,
unless good cause is shown or the school official previously has been the subject of an OTSC, “the
Commission shall recommend that a board member or trustee who completes training after the
Commission issues its decision, but before the Commissioner issues a final decision, receives a
suspension for 30 days.” N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.3(c). However, “the Commission will recommend this
penalty only if the board member or the trustee provides to the [NJSBA] and the Commission
written notice before the Commissioner issues a final decision.” Ibid. If the board member or trustee
fails to complete training as of the date the Commissioner issues its final decision, the Commission
will recommend removal of the board member or trustee from his or her position. N.J.A.C. 6A:28-
4.3(d).
For the reasons set forth above, the Commission recommends that the Commissioner of
Education impose a penalty of removal, with such removal to become effective immediately upon
issuance of the Commissioner of Education’s decision. However, if Respondent completes training
before the Commissioner of Education adopts a final decision (which will be within forty-five (45)
days 	after 	the 	mailing 	date 	of 	this 	decision), 	then 	the 	Commission 	recommends 	that 	the
Commissioner of Education, in lieu of removal, impose a thirty (30) day suspension, with such
suspension to become effective immediately upon issuance of the Commissioner of Education’s
decision, provided the board member or trustee provides written notice of successful completion of
the training requirement.
Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:12-29(c), this decision shall be forwarded to the Commissioner of
Education for review of the Commission’s recommended penalty. Respondent may either: 1) file
exceptions to the recommended sanction; 2) file an appeal of the Commission’s finding of a
violation; or 3) file both exceptions to the recommended sanction together with an appeal of the
finding of a violation.

3
Parties taking exception to the recommended sanction of the Commission but not disputing
the Commission’s finding of a violation may file, within thirteen (13) days from the date the
Commission’s decision is forwarded to the Commissioner, written exceptions regarding the
recommended penalty to the Commissioner. The forwarding date shall be the mailing date to the
parties, as indicated below. Such exceptions must be forwarded to: Commissioner of Education, c/o
Bureau of Controversies and Disputes, P.O. Box 500, Trenton, New Jersey 08625, marked
“Attention: 	Comments 	on 	Ethics 	Commission 	Sanction.” 	as 	well 	as 	to
(ControversiesDisputesFilings@doe.nj.gov). 	A 	copy 	must 	also 	be 	sent 	to 	the 	Commission
(school.ethics@doe.nj.gov) and all other parties.
Parties seeking to appeal the Commission’s finding of violation must file an appeal pursuant
to the standards set forth at N.J.A.C. 6A:4:1 et seq. within thirty (30) days of the filing date of the
decision from which the appeal is taken. The filing date shall be three (3) days after the date of
mailing to the parties, as shown below. In such cases, the Commissioner’s review of the
Commission’s recommended sanction will be deferred and incorporated into the Commissioner’s
review of the finding of violation on appeal. Where a notice of appeal has been filed on or before
the due date for exceptions to the Commission’s recommended sanction (thirteen (13) days from the
date the decision is mailed by the Commission), exceptions need not be filed by that date, but may
be incorporated into the appellant’s briefs on appeal.
______________________________
Robert W. Bender, Chairperson
Mailing Date: July 23, 2024

4
Resolution Adopting Decision for Failure to Complete Mandatory
Training Requirement in a Timely Manner
Docket No.: T16-24
Whereas, Gisselle Bond (Respondent) is a “board member” as defined in N.J.S.A. 18A:12-23 of the
School Ethics Act (Act); and
Whereas, as a board member, Respondent is required to complete a training program prepared and
offered by the New Jersey School Boards Association (NJSBA) on an annual basis; and
Whereas, Respondent failed to complete her training program by December 31, 2023; and
Whereas, at its special meeting on June 17, 2024, the School Ethics Commission (Commission)
issued an Order to Show Cause (OTSC) directing Respondent to show cause as to why she failed to complete
her mandatory training by December 31, 2023, as required by N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1;
and
Whereas, after having been served with the OTSC, Respondent failed to respond to the
Commission’s OTSC as to why she did not complete training by December 31, 2023, and also failed to
complete training as required by N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1; and
Whereas, at its meeting on July 23, 2024, the Commission found that Respondent violated N.J.S.A.
18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1 by failing to complete the training requirement she was obligated to
complete; and
Whereas, at its meeting on July 23, 2024, the Commission recommended that the Commissioner of
Education impose a penalty of removal, with such removal to become effective immediately upon issuance
of a final decision by the Commissioner of Education. However, if Respondent completes training before the
Commissioner of Education adopts a final decision (which will be within forty-five (45) days after the
mailing date of this decision), then the Commission recommends that the Commissioner of Education, in lieu
of removal, impose a thirty (30) day suspension, with such suspension to become effective immediately upon
issuance of a final decision by the Commissioner of Education, provided the board member or trustee
provides written notice of the successful completion of the training requirement; and
Whereas, at its meeting on July 23, 2024, the Commission agreed that the within decision accurately
memorializes its findings and recommendations; and
Now Therefore Be It Resolved, that the Commission hereby adopts the within decision and directs
its staff to notify all parties to this action of the decision.
_____________________________
Robert W. Bender, Chairperson
I certify that the within Resolution was duly adopted
by the School Ethics Commission at its public meeting
on July 23, 2024.
_____________________________
Brigid C. Martens, Director
School Ethics Commission