ELIGIO CASTRO V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, ATLANTIC COUNTY, 3/15/00 (92-00)

92-00Njcommned

Full text

92-00
ELIGIO CASTRO, 	:
PETITIONER, 	:
V. 	: 	COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY : 	DECISION
OF ATLANTIC CITY, ATLANTIC
COUNTY, 	:
RESPONDENT. 	:
SYNOPSIS
Petitioning nontenured teacher contested the Board’s nonrenewal of his contract, asserting that the
Board failed to provide him with the required number of teaching evaluations and that the Board
discriminated against him because he was a cancer patient.
The ALJ determined that the Board complied with N.J.A.C. 6:3-4.1, providing petitioner with three
evaluations, including one which petitioner requested be set aside upon learning that he had cancer but
which the Board was unable to repeat because petitioner never returned to school. The ALJ also found
that petitioner abandoned his discrimination claim because petitioner reported that his claim had been
filed in federal district court.
The Commissioner concurred with the findings and conclusions of the ALJ that respondent evaluated
petitioner in conformity with applicable law and affirmed the recommended decision for the reasons
expressed therein.
March 15, 2000
7
OAL DKT. NO. EDU 8008-99
AGENCY DKT. NO. 267-8/99
ELIGIO CASTRO, 	:
PETITIONER, 	:
V. 	: 	COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY : 	DECISION
OF ATLANTIC CITY, ATLANTIC
COUNTY, 	:
RESPONDENT. 	:
The record of this matter and the Initial Decision of the Office of Administrative Law
(OAL) have been reviewed. The parties filed no exceptions to the Initial Decision.
Upon his independent and careful review, the Commissioner concurs with the findings
and conclusions of the Administrative Law Judge that respondent evaluated petitioner in conformity
with the applicable law. Since it is a well-established legal principle that a district board of education
has virtually unlimited discretion in hiring or renewing non-tenured teachers, the Commissioner
concurs that respondent acted within its lawful discretion in not renewing petitioner’s employment in
the school district.
Accordingly, the recommended decision of the OAL is affirmed for the reasons
expressed therein.
IT IS SO ORDERED. *
COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
Date of Decision: 	March 15, 2000
* This decision, as the Commissioner’s final determination, may be appealed to the State Board of Education pursuant to
N.J.S.A. 18A:6-27 et seq. and N.J.A.C. 6:2-1.1 et seq., within 30 days of its filing. Commissioner decisions are deemed
filed three days after the date of mailing to the parties.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.