Joseph S. Haas, Jr. v. Town of Gilmanton

CourtListener 10309398NhMay 13, 2021

Full text

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2020-0325, Joseph S. Haas, Jr. v. Town of
Gilmanton, the court on May 13, 2021, issued the following
order:

Having considered the opening and reply briefs of the plaintiff, Joseph S.
Haas, Jr., the memorandum of law of the defendant, the Town of Gilmanton,
and the record submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is
unnecessary in this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the appealing party,
the plaintiff, has not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); see also
Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014).

Affirmed.

Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.