Opinion No. (2006)

CourtListener 3562291MoagFeb 21, 2006

Full text

Dear Secretary Carnahan:

This opinion letter responds to your request dated February 17, 2006, for our review under Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition submitted by Marc Ellinger, to adopt a new section of the Constitution of Missouri, to be known as Section 21(a) of Article VI, relating to eminent domain and the development of flood plains, wetlands, and agricultural land (Version 2).

We approve the petition as to form. But Section 116.332 gives the Secretary of State final authority to approve or reject the petition. Therefore, our approval of the form of the petition does not preclude you from rejecting the petition.

Because our review of the petition is simply for the purpose of determining sufficiency as to form, the fact that we do not reject the petition is not to be construed as a determination that the petition is sufficient as to substance. Likewise, because our review is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the petition or of the objectives of its proponents, or the expression of any view respecting the adequacy or inadequacy of the petition generally.

Very truly yours,

JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON Attorney General

Attached is Missouri Attorney General Opinion Letter No. 83-2006 issued on February 21, 2006. For purposes of indexing, we are summarizing the opinion as follows:

Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition to adopt a new Section 21(a) of Article VI
of the Constitution of Missouri, relating to eminent domain and the development of flood plains, wetlands, and agricultural land.

We are indexing the opinion under the heading: Initiative Petition Initiatives

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.