PEOPLE OF MI V KEISHAUN ANTHONY MACK

169612Supreme CourtMay 22, 2026

Full text

Michigan Supreme Court
Lansing, Michigan
Megan K. Cavanagh,
Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra
Richard H. Bernstein
Elizabeth M. Welch
Kyra H. Bolden
Kimberly A. Thomas
Noah P. Hood,
Justices
Order
May 22, 2026
SC: 169612 & (37)
COA: 374186
Muskegon CC: 2024-001254-FH
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
KEISHAUN ANTHONY MACK,
Defendant-Appellant.
On order of the Court, the motion for stay is GRANTED, and the trial court
proceedings in the Muskegon Circuit Court are stayed pending the completion of this
appeal. The application for leave to appeal the December 8, 2025 judgment of the Court
of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the
application. MCR 7.305(I)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs in accordance
with MCR 7.312(E), addressing whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial
court’s ruling that the defendant lacked standing to challenge the officers’ search of the
residence, i.e., whether he lacked a protected privacy right under the Fourth Amendment
to the United States Constitution or Const 1963, art 1, § 11. See, e.g., Minnesota v Carter,
525 US 83, 87-91 (1998); Minnesota v Olson, 495 US 91, 96-97 (1990); People v Parker,
230 Mich App 337, 340 (1998).
We further ORDER the Muskegon Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative
Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint
attorney Terry J. Nolan, if feasible, to represent the defendant in this Court. If this
appointment is not feasible, the trial court shall, within the same time frame, appoint other
counsel to represent the defendant in this Court. The defendant’s brief is due within 42
days after the date of the order appointing counsel or of the ruling that the defendant is not
entitled to appointed counsel.
The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense
Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups
interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case who are not exempt from

-- 1 of 2 --

I, Elizabeth Kingston-Miller, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
May 22, 2026
s0519
2
Clerk
the motion requirement under MCR 7.312(H) may move the Court for permission to file
briefs amicus curiae.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.