169866•ROBERT A PASIONEK V ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD
Full text
Michigan Supreme Court
Lansing, Michigan
Megan K. Cavanagh,
Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra
Richard H. Bernstein
Elizabeth M. Welch
Kyra H. Bolden
Kimberly A. Thomas
Noah P. Hood,
Justices
I, Elizabeth Kingston-Miller, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
June 18, 2026
a0615
Order
Clerk
June 18, 2026
SC: 169866 & (3)(8)(13)(15)(19)
ADB: 25-2-GA
ROBERT A. PASIONEK,
Plaintiff,
v
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD,
Defendant.
On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and to supplement
are GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is
DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The
requests for stay are DENIED.
-- 1 of 1 --
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.