ROGER RAY MACNEILL V OPHELIA MAE MCKINNEY

380927Court Of AppealsAug 24, 2026

Full text

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan
ORDER
ROGER RAY MACNEILL V OPHELIA MAE MCKINNEY
Docket No. 380927
LC No. 2023-003834-DP
Daniel S. Korobkin
Presiding Judge
Kathleen A. Feeney
Randy J. Wallace
Judges
The motion for stay pending appeal is DENIED.
The motion for “Record Preservation, Acceptance of Supplemental Materials, and
Consideration of Master Exhibit Record” is DENIED.
The motion “For Protective Order, Stay of Disclosure, In Camera Review, and Sealing of
Psychological Evaluation” is DENIED.
The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED, only to the extent that expedited
consideration has been given to the matters on which immediate consideration has been requested.
The motion for accommodations and extensions of time is DENIED.
The motion to produce transcripts at public expense is DENIED.
The motion to extend time to file transcripts is DENIED. Appellant was already given
additional time to produce the transcripts, and no further extension of time is warranted.
The application for leave to appeal is DENIED for lack of merit in the grounds presented.
_______________________________
Presiding Judge
August 24, 2026

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.