White v. Wiegleb

CourtListener 10345515MesuperctJun 11, 2020

Full text

(

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT
CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION
DOCKET NO. CV-19-438

MARK WHITE,

Plaintiff
V. ORDER

. - -.-.­
JACQUELINE WIEGLEB, '...: ­

. ·--:.... '
Defendant

Defendant Jacqueline Wiegleb has filed a motion to dismiss. The basis of the motion is the

argument that under M.R.Civ.P. l 3(a), plaintiff Mark White's defamation claims were required to

asserted as compulsory counterclaims in Wiegleb v. White, Docket No. CV-19-138 (Superior Court

Cumberland County) because they arose out of the same .transactions or occurrences that formed

the subject of Wiegleb's claims in that action. CV-19-138 was the subject of a bench trial last

February and was decided last March. The court can take judicial notice that the trial resulted in

judgment in favor of Wiegleb on the assault and battery claims in counts one and two of her

complaint.

Wiegleb's motion to dismiss in this action was filed on March 2, 2020 and included a Rule

7(b)(l) notice. Originally White would have been required to file an opposition on or before March

23, 2020. The Pandemic Management Orders extended that deadline to May 11, 2020.

No opposition has been filed by White, and a month has passed since the May 11 deadline.

Accordingly, Wiegleb's motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed.
( 'I'

The entry shall be:

Plaintiffs motion to dismiss the complaint is granted. The clerk shall incorporate this order
in the docket by reference pursuant to Rule 79(a).

Dated: June _J_l_, 2020

Thomas D. Warren
Justice, Superior Court

tvJ,I
Entered on the Docket: ·o~usjio

Plaintiff-Randy Robinson, Esq.
Defendant-Lee Bals, Esq.

2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.