USA v. Salvador et al

ORDER - 1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

EFREN SANDOVAL,

Defendant.

Nos. 2:23-CR-00046-MKD-12

ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO MODIFY
CONDITIONS OF RELEASE

MOTION GRANTED
(ECF NO. 555)

Before the Court is Defendant EFREN SANDOVAL’s Unopposed Motion
to Modify Conditions of Release. ECF No. 555. Defendant seeks termination of
Pretrial Release Condition No. 14 requiring Defendant to wear, at all times, a
GPS device under the supervision of United States Probation, ECF No. 510.
The United States and U.S. Probation do not oppose modification of Defendant’s
Pretrial Release Condition 14.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant’s Motion, ECF No. 555, is GRANTED.
2. Pretrial Release Condition No. 14 in the Order Releasing Defendant,
ECF No. 510, is STRICKEN.
3. All other conditions of pretrial release set forth in the Order
Releasing Defendant, ECF No. 510, shall remain in full force and effect.
4. If a party seeks reconsideration of Defendant’s detention before this
Court because of material and newly discovered circumstances, any such motion
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
Feb 06, 2025
Case 2:23-cr-00046-MKD ECF No. 559 filed 02/06/25 PageID.<pageID> Page
1 of 2

ORDER - 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
shall be a maximum of four-pages in length and shall succinctly state what
circumstances are new, how they are established, and the requested change in
conditions of release. The motion shall indicate whether opposing counsel; United
States Probation/Pretrial Services; or another party with a substantial interest in the
motion objects, whether a hearing is desired, and whether a supplemental pretrial
services report is requested. If the moving party, after the exercise of due
diligence, is unable to determine the position of any party listed above, the moving
party may in the alternative document the date; time; and manner of each effort
made to determine that party’s position and request the Court treat the motion as
expedited and submitted without argument. Motions in Spokane cases shall be
heard as set by the Spokane Magistrate Judge Courtroom Deputy. Yakima
cases shall be heard on the following Wednesday docket, and Richland cases
shall be heard on the following Thursday docket. If the Court determines that
oral argument is unnecessary on the motion, the motion shall be set for decision on
the Court’s 6:30 p.m. docket.
5. If a party desires that another court review this Order pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3145, that party shall promptly file a motion for review before the district
judge to whom the case is assigned, as further described in the Detention Order
Review Protocol published for the Eastern District of Washington. Both parties
shall cooperate to ensure that the motion is promptly determined.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED February 6, 2025.

_____________________________________
JAMES A. GOEKE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:23-cr-00046-MKD ECF No. 559 filed 02/06/25 PageID.<pageID> Page
2 of 2