Jennings v. St. Tammany Parish Courts et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

BERT PATRICK JENNINGS

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

NO. 25-2192

ST. TAMMANY PARISH COURTS ET AL.

SECTION AP@ (5)

ORDER

The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the failure of Plaintiff to file an objection to the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,
1
hereby approves the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion herein. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s suit is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii).
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 6th day of August 2026.
__________________________________________
DARREL JAMES PAPILLION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1
The Report and Recommendation was returned as “undeliverable.” Local Civil Rule 11.1 provides that each “pro se
litigant has a continuing obligation promptly to notify the court of any address or telephone number change.” Eight
months have passed since the Report and Recommendation was returned from Plaintiff as undeliverable, and Plaintiff
has failed to update the Court with an applicable new address.
Case 2:25-cv-02192-DJP Document 9 Filed 08/06/26 Page 1 of 1