Leslie A. Holz v. John C. Holz

CourtListener 3161133IowactappDec 9, 2015

Full text

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 15-0419
Filed December 9, 2015

LESLIE A. HOLZ,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JOHN C. HOLZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jackson County, Nancy S. Tabor,

Judge.

John Holz appeals the entry of a final Iowa Code chapter 236 (2015)

protective order. REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Bradley T. Boffeli of Boffeli & Spannagel, P.C., Maquoketa, for appellant.

Leslie A. Holz, Zwingle, appellee pro se.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Vaitheswaran and Bower, JJ. Tabor, J.,

takes no part.
2

VAITHESWARAN, Judge.

John Holz appeals a district court order granting his wife Leslie Holz a final

domestic abuse protective order under Iowa Code chapter 236 (2015). He

contends the district court erred in finding sufficient evidence of an assault to

support issuance of the protective order.

Iowa Code section 236.2(b) defines “domestic abuse” in part as an

“assault [] between separated spouses or persons divorced from each other and

not residing together at the time of the assault.” “Assault” is defined as follows:

A person commits an assault when, without justification, the person
does any of the following:
a. Any act which is intended to cause pain or injury to, or
which is intended to result in physical contact which will be
insulting or offensive to another, coupled with the apparent
ability to execute the act.
b. Any act which is intended to place another in fear of
immediate physical contact which will be painful, injurious,
insulting, or offensive, coupled with the apparent ability to
execute the act.
c. Intentionally points any firearm toward another, or displays
in a threatening manner any dangerous weapon toward
another.

Iowa Code § 708.1(2). A “claim of ‘fear,’ standing alone and absent an assault,

does not give rise to a claim under chapter 236.” See, e.g., Owens v. Owens,

No. 08-1374, 2009 WL 606590, at *3 (Iowa Ct. App. Mar. 11, 2009); see also

Shannon v. Baumgartner, No. 14-1650, 2015 WL 4935711, at *3-4 (Iowa Ct.

App. Aug. 19, 2015). This is all we have.

Leslie sought a divorce from John while both lived in Arizona. Leslie later

moved to Iowa; John remained in Arizona. Several months after her move,

Leslie filed the chapter 236 petition, alleging in part that her husband obtained

“numerous life insurance policies on” her life. At a hearing on the petition, Leslie
3

testified she continued to receive life insurance policies in the mail and they

“disturb[ed]” her. She also testified John “told friends he” would “destroy” her.

When asked if her husband had been in Iowa, she responded, “I have no idea.”

She conceded she had not seen John for approximately six months.

This evidence is insufficient to meet the statutory definition of assault.

See, e.g., Shannon, 2015 WL 4935711, at *3-4; Kadura v. Kadura, No. 09-0704,

2009 WL 4842838, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2009); Owens, 2009 WL

606590, at *2-3. We reverse the protective order and remand for dismissal of

Leslie’s petition.

John seeks to have Leslie pay $1000 of his attorney fee obligation. Iowa

Code chapter 236 does not authorize payment of fees by the plaintiff in a

domestic abuse action. See Iowa Code § 236.5(4) (“The court may order that

the defendant pay the plaintiff's attorney fees and court costs.”). John’s request

is denied.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.