3:25-cv-00697•Chan, Keith v. Bacdayan, Karen et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN KEITH CHAN, Plaintiff, v. KAREN MAY BACDAYAN, KEVIN C. MCCLANAHAN, and RE/MAX, Defendants. OPINION and ORDER 25-cv-697-jdp Plaintiff Keith Chan, proceeding without counsel, attempts to bring a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against three parties, including Re/Max, the owner of his apartment. I dismissed Chan’s original complaint because it was far too vague to state a claim. Dkt. 4. I directed him to file an amended complaint and warned him that if he failed to do so I would dismiss the entire case. Id. Chan has not filed an amended complaint by his deadline for doing so, so I will dismiss the case. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. This case is DISMISSED. 2. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Entered January 7, 2026. BY THE COURT: /s/ ________________________________________ JAMES D. PETERSON District Judge Case: 3:25-cv-00697-jdp Document #: 5 Filed: 01/07/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.