2:26-cv-00180•Hooge v. Sugerman et al
Full text
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA JORDAN M. HOOGE, Plaintiff, v. L. MICHELLE SUGERMAN, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:25-cv-00592-APG-NJK Order [Docket No. 47] Pending before the Court is Defendants’ stipulation to substitute counsel. Docket No. 47. LR IA 6-2 requires that stipulations include an “order” in the form of a signature block on which the court can endorse approval of the relief sought. “This signature block must not begin on a separate page; it must appear approximately 1 inch below the last typewritten matter on the right-hand side of the last page of the stipulation.” LR IA 6-2. Defendants’ stipulation fails to comply with the requirements of LR IA 6-2. Nonetheless, the Court GRANTS the stipulation to substitute counsel. Docket No. 47. The parties are ORDERED to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules in all filings to the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2025 ______________________________ Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge Case 2:26-cv-00180-RJS Document 52 Filed 12/02/25 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.