Coulter v. Smith et al

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH
Alicia Coulter
Plaintiff,
v.
Jackson Philip Smith, et al.
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ORDER OF
INJUNCTIONAL RELIEF
Case No. 2:25-cv-1090 AMA DBP
Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen
Chief Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead
Before the court is pro se Plaintiff Alicia Coulter’s “Motion for Order of Injunctional
Relief.”1 Plaintiff requests “injunction relief to have the United States Marshall Service; service
the Defendant(s) in the heading grant order.”2 The Motion is DENIED as Plaintiff provides no
basis to grant it and it violates the court’s prior orders.
On December 3, 2025, the court entered an order temporarily granting Plaintiff’s Motion
for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.3 In that order the court provided that
Other than court forms (e.g., the email filing and electronic notification form for
unrepresented parties and the consent to jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge form),
Plaintiff must not file any other documents during the time the complaint is
screened or until the court orders otherwise. If Plaintiff files any such other
documents, they will be lodged on the docket and will not be addressed until
screening of the complaint is completed.4
1 ECF No. 16.
2 Motion at 1.
3 ECF No. 5.
4 Order at 2.
Case 2:25-cv-01090-AMA Document 17 Filed 01/12/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1
of 2

2
Plaintiff’s Complaint is still in the screening process and the current motion is an “other
document” that should not be filed until after the screening process is complete.
More importantly, on December 4, 2025, the court Ordered Plaintiff to file an amended
complaint, finding the original Complaint deficient in many respects. Plaintiff has yet to comply
with filing an Amended Complaint. Given that the deadline is January 9, 2026, and that Plaintiff
is proceeding pro se, the court will extend the deadline an additional time frame until January 19,
2026, for Plaintiff to comply. A failure to comply may result in the court dismissing Plaintiff’s
Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 9 January 2026.
_______________________________
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead
United States District Court for the District of Utah
Case 2:25-cv-01090-AMA Document 17 Filed 01/12/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 2
of 2