7:25-cv-00196•Lozano-Salazar v. United States Of America
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MCALLEN DIVISION JOSE FELIPE LOZANO-SALAZAR, § § Petitioner, § § v. § Civil Action No. 7:25-CV-00196 § § Criminal Action No. 7:22-CR-01378-5 § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § § Respondent. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is the December 18, 2025, Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Juan F. Alanis. (Dkt. No. 18). Judge Alanis made findings and conclusions and recommended that Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, (Dkt. No. 1), be denied and dismissed with prejudice, that Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to File Amended § 2255 Motion, (Dkt. No. 15), and Petitioner’s Motion to Amend § 2255 Motion, (Dkt. No. 16), be denied as moot, and this case be closed. (Dkt. No. 18). The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. Accordingly, the Court accepts the R&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ordered that: United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED January 26, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 7:25-cv-00196 Document 19 Filed 01/23/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2 (1) Judge Alanis’s R&R, (Dkt. No. 18), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; (2) Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, (Dkt. No. 1), is DENIED; and (3) Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to File Amended § 2255 Motion, (Dkt. No. 15), and Petitioner’s Motion to Amend § 2255 Motion, (Dkt. No. 16), are DENIED as moot. It is SO ORDERED. Signed on January 23, 2026. ___________________________________ DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 7:25-cv-00196 Document 19 Filed 01/23/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.