6:25-cv-00049•Dickerson v. Victoria County City Police Officers, Victoria, Tx et al
Dickerson v. Victoria County City Police Officers, Victoria, Tx et al
6:25-cv-00049TxsdMar 27, 2026
Full text
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED March 27, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 6:25-cv-00049 Document 34 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 6:25-cv-00049 Document 34 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 6:25-cv-00049 Document 34 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page1of2 United States District Court Southem District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 27, 2026 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk VICTORIA DIVISION RUDY DICKERSON, § § Plaintiff, § § Vv. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:25-CV-00049 § VICTORIA COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS, § VICTORIA, TX, ef al, § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 31). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff's claims, (D.E. 28), and impose a “strike” under 28 U.S.C, § 1915(g). (D.E. 31, p. 15). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C, § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *J (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.} (citation omitted), Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety, (D.E. 31). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's claims, (D.E. 28), and IMPOSES a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915¢g). The Court INSTRUCTS the Clerk of Court to send notice of this dismissal to 1/2 AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO Case 6:25-cv-00049 Document 34 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2 the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at Three Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov. The Court will enter a final judgment separately. ] DAVID'SSMORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SO ORDERED, Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas March 2942026 2/2 : |
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.