4:26-cv-02687•Paige v. Digital Business Networks Alliance, Inc. et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MICHELLE PAIGE, § § § § § § § § Plaintiffs, VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:26-CV-02687 DIGITAL BUSINESS NETWORKS ALLIANCE, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court are Defendants McGinnis Lochridge, LLP’s, Philip Schmandt’s, OFS Portal, LLC’s, and Digital Business Networks Alliance, Inc.’s motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 46, 49, 53). Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho, to whom this case is referred for all pretrial matters, recommended DENYING the Motions to Dismiss as moot, because Plaintiff has since filed an amended complaint. See ECF No. 79 (Memorandum, Recommendation, and Order). Defendants did not object to this Recommendation. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed the Recommendation as to the Motions to Dismiss for clear error. Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Recommendation. Plaintiff Michelle Paige has filed objections Judge Ho’s Memorandum, Recommendation, and Order pertaining to Judge Ho’s reasoning regarding the denial of Plaintiff’s Motions to Strike Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 51, 54, 59). Because the Motions to Strike are not dispositive of Plaintiff’s claims, the Court has reviewed the portions of the Order to which Plaintiff objects to determine whether they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See FED. R. C IV. P RO. 72(a). However, the Court finds no clear error in Judge Ho’s order on the Motions to Strike. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Memorandum, Recommendation, and Order United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED July 20, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 4:26-cv-02687 Document 96 Filed 07/20/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
and DENIES AS MOOT the three pending Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 46, 49, 53). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed at Houston, Texas on July 20, 2026. _______________________________ Keith P. Ellison United States District Judge Case 4:26-cv-02687 Document 96 Filed 07/20/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.