4:25-cv-04209•Alexander v. Montgomery County Community Supervision & Corrections Department, et al
Alexander v. Montgomery County Community Supervision & Corrections Department, et al
4:25-cv-04209TxsdApr 8, 2026
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MARGARET ALEXANDRA ALEXANDER § vs MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISION & CORRECTIONS, et al § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-25-4209 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding is Defendants Montgomery County Sheriffs Office, Montgomery County District Attorney' s Office, Montgomery County Community Supervision & Corrections Department, Montgomery County Attorney' s Office, Brett Ligon, and Laurie Frankenfield (Montgomery County Defendants) Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No 53) and Defendant the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services' (DFPS) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 54) together responses and replies, and Magistrate Judge Bennett's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No . 101). Plaintiff has filed objections (Doc. No. 102) to the Memorandum and Recommendation. The Court has carefully reviewed, de novo, the filings, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge' s Memorandum and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, and agrees with the Magistrate Judge ' s conclusions. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Objections (Doc. No. 102) are OVERRULED; the Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 101) is ADOPTED; and Defendants Montgomery County Sheriff's Office, Montgomery County District Attorney' s Office, Montgomery County Community Supervision & Corrections Department, Montgomery County Attorney' s Office, Brett Ligon, and United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED April 08, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 4:25-cv-04209 Document 103 Filed 04/08/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Laurie Frankenfield Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No 53) and Defendant the Texas Department of
Family and Protective Services' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 54) are GRANTED. Plaintiffs
Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE It is further
ORDERED that all other pending motions (Doc. Nos. 11 , 13, 14, 20, 24, 26, 41 , 79) are
DENIED AS MOOT . .
-('---
SIGNED on this __'o' __ day of April 2026.
ANDREW S. HANEN ......___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Case 4:25-cv-04209 Document 103 Filed 04/08/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.