Trevino Vallejo et al v. Jaddou

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 4:25-cv-03300 Document 43 Filed 03/31/26 in TXSD Page1of2
United States District Court

Southem District of Texas
ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 31, 2026
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
HOUSTON DIVISION
MA ELIZABETH TREVINO VALLEJO, §
etal, §
§
Plaintiffs, §
§
VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:25-CV-03300
§
UR M. JADDOU, §
§
Defendant, §
ORDER

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Dena H. Palermo’s Memorandum and
Recommendation filed on December 5, 2025. Doc. #42. ‘The deadline for filing objections has
passed, and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the
Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation for clear error. United States v.
Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the
Memorandum and Recommendation (Doe, #42) in its entirety,

Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #18) is hereby GRANTED. Claims
submitted by Plaintiffs who have bona fide determinations or employment authorization are
DISMISSED AS MOOT, For the remaining Plaintiffs: (1) their APA claims related to bona fide
determinations or employment authorizations are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of
jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1); and (2) their APA claims and
Mandamus Act claims about waiting-list placement and Due Process claims are DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 4:25-cv-03300 Document 43 Filed 03/31/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

It is so ORDERED.

MAR 3 4 2026

Date The Honorable K\ red H. Bennett
United States Disfrict Judge